When one of our portfolio companies is planning to expand to the US, one of the first things a founder asks is can we connect them with another founder or operator who has done it before. And rightfully so! The wisdom gleaned from a conversation with someone who has “been there, done that” can prove invaluable. It’s a chance to not only sense-check your strategic approach but also sidestep common and costly pitfalls.
We’re scaling access to those conversations with a summary of the who, what, when, where and how of expanding into the US. That sounds pretty straightforward, so before you go any further, it’s worth acknowledging that every time you expand into a new country, your job becomes exponentially harder. When you go from one country to two, you square the problem. Two countries to three, you cube the problem. You get the gist.
Our second caveat is that this isn’t an exhaustive guide–there are way to many ways you could slice and dice it based on your specific business–it serves as a starting point to get you thinking about an approach that makes sense for your startup, with some tips and advice to guide you along the way.
For Aussie and Kiwi startups with global ambitions, the case for expanding into the US market is compelling, with a huge total addressable market (TAM) up for grabs. In fact, the majority of founders we spoke to say that, with hindsight, they wish they had built their presence in the US sooner.
But it's also worth playing devil's advocate and asking yourself: Is international expansion critical for your company right now? Or will you spread resources too thin and lose your focus and leadership in the ANZ market?
Push (proactive) and pull (reactive) forces also come into play, influencing your decision and shaping your approach:
Ultimately, there is no right or wrong time, but you will want to have solid answers to the following questions before you make a move:
A typical journey might look like:
The sage advice from all founders is to test first. Before you reallocate all your time and resources to the US, do a pilot, spend a few weeks there, see whether you have product-market fit and speak to customers. The risk is it becomes a massive time suck and distraction instead of a big prize.
What you sell and the way you sell it may need some adaptations or modifications before you're ready for the US market. Whether you require a little or a lot of changes will depend on your product or service. Here's what we commonly hear from SaaS founders.
The claim that "the founder has to move to the US" is a guide but not a rule. The majority of founders in Airtree's portfolio with a presence in the US haven't permanently relocated; instead, they've set up a cadence of regular travel or have lived there for a stint.
A common arrangement if you have a co-founder is to have the commercial co-founder based in the US. Having a founder in-market is crucial for making your first key hires, setting the vision and securing necessary resources and attention from HQ needed to make the move a success.
For ANZ-based founders trying to build their presence in the US, here are a few practical tips:
To your customers and investors, you're based in the US for all intents and purposes, which signals your commitment to the market.
Expanding into the US is like a "second launch" for your startup. One way to approach hiring is like you would if you're a startup just starting out. Your first few hires need to be strong individual contributors who know how to build autonomously from scratch. You won't have time to hand-hold them yourself unless you commit to not sleeping!
A recurring theme from our discussions with founders highlighted the painful lessons learned from hiring mistakes.
Mistake #1: Buying a logo
Paying top price for a new hire based on their previous experience, thinking they’ve done this before and could do it again, when the reality was they were only part of the solution, not the actual changemaker who drove the company/function from point A to B.
Mistake #2: Hiring too many people
Don’t try to scale too quickly, or you’ll burn through your runway. Instead, treat it like an MVP, and don’t scale headcount until you get evidence of demand and traction.
Mistake #3: Being sold the dream
US candidates are hard-wired to sell themselves, while Australians tend towards the opposite. If it's your first time recruiting in the US, you may be blown away by candidate after candidate who seemingly ticks all of your boxes. But you'll need to dig a little deeper to ensure their "say" matches their "do".
Salaries are not comparable between Australia and the US or even city by city in the US. US talent is very aware of their market value and benchmark compensation. It's time to make peace with the fact that you'll be paying more than what you're used to for similar roles, plus healthcare and benefits.
From there, it’s worth devising your remuneration principles, for example:
Market data is your friend. Ask your VC if they have a compensation database. Find benchmarking reports. Or use services like Carta Total Comp and Glassdoor.
The typical approach to distributing headcount across geographies is by function. For startups with the majority of their TAM in the US, most founders opt to keep engineering and operations in ANZ and establish a go-to-market team in the US. This isn’t a one-size-fits-all recommendation, and it’s worth regularly assessing your organisational structure to secure the resources you need to be successful in each market.
Engineering
Keeping the engineering team in ANZ, especially for early-stage startups, is driven by salary considerations and access to talent. It’s more cost effective to retain your engineering team in ANZ, and you’re likely to have an established employer brand that can attract high-quality talent–two advantages you wouldn’t want to compromise.
Product
In the early days, it’s common for the product team to be co-located with engineering for seamless collaboration. As you expand your customer base in the US, having a small satellite team there can enhance collaboration with clients, understand their needs better and then tailor your product accordingly. This team can also assist sales efforts by offering technical expertise during client meetings and sales demos.
If your product team remains in ANZ, it’s crucial to establish robust operating processes and communication channels between engineering, product and go-to-market teams.
Go-to-market
Establishing a solid presence in the US market necessitates having sales, marketing and customer support teams on the ground. Many startups retain a portion of these teams in ANZ to maintain relationships with existing clients and leverage tacit knowledge of the brand and product. Over time, the bulk of the go-to-market headcount shifts to the US to drive brand awareness, generate leads, close sales and provide timely customer support.
While Delaware is the go-to State to register your company, where you choose to base yourself or your team may differ. San Francisco and the broader Bay Area are popular choices, providing access to a large talent pool, investors, and business networks. But it's worthwhile examining what other cities in the US may be a better fit for your business. Here are some questions worth asking to get you started:
Let’s take a look at some of the usual suspects of where to set up shop, plus some other US metro areas worth exploring.
While the maxim is to go where your customers are, if you're looking to raise capital, consider the deal activity in the city and the investors based there.
Payroll and benefits are more complex and cumbersome in the US than ANZ. You'll want to get things right from the get-go, as non-compliance can result in heavy penalties. Most founders and operators recommend paying a PEO to do it for your peace of mind.
A PEO handles employee payroll, compliance with all filings, health and safety regulations, and the provision of health and pension benefits (401k). They will also register offices and/or employees with state-level departments. Using a PEO doesn't affect stock option grants. We've compiled a guide to the pros and cons of PEOs and a list of providers.
Figuring out which visa is right for you and navigating the application process can be a battlefield.
In the early days when you’re doing market visits, you can use the ESTA visa waiver program (VWP) for stays of 90 days or less. Business activities permitted while in the US on the VVP include:
Once you or someone from your team is ready to relocate, you’ll need to assess the best visa route. Nationality determines visa eligibility, so to get Aussie’s started, check out our overview of US work visas for Australians. An immigration specialist may also be a worthwhile investment to guide you through this process.
You can do business in the US without reincorporating (flipping) your company. Companies that don’t reincorporate use a US-based subsidiary to operate and hire employees in the US. However, you may choose to reincorporate–most commonly a Delaware Flip–to facilitate business and gain easy access to US investors.
Before flipping, there's a lot to consider, from tax implications to revenue recognition and transfer pricing, so start planning early. We've covered all the key details about the Delaware Flip here.
To open a company bank account in the US, banks need to execute their Know Your Customer (KYC) formalities, requiring you to gather a bunch of documentation such as:
You can set up a US bank account online with International banks like Silicon Valley Bank, First Republic and HSBC. However, it’s usually recommended that you have someone physically present in the US to set up your account as some banks prefer to handle additional follow-up questions and admin in person.
The US has a highly litigious business environment. US companies spend 166% more on legal services than their global counterparts, with technology being one of the industries facing high levels of litigation. As such, it’s wise to have a good lawyer on hand for all the initial setup (e.g. subsidiary setup, employment contracts, stock options plans, Americanise commercial contracts, trademark and patent filing, data privacy etc.) as well as ongoing counsel.
Cooley, Fenwick, Akerman, Goodwin, and Morrison & Foster are all firms well-versed in startups and technology.